Re: USB support for device tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 01:55:09PM +0530, Pavan Kondeti wrote:
>>> Hi
>>> I am working on adding USB device tree support for MSM platform.  One of
>>> our chip set has 2 hsusb cores. The first core is configured as otg and
>>> the other core is configured in host only mode (EHCI compliant). Are the
>>> below device node names Okay? Please suggest.
>> Why do you need to name the speed of the device and the host?  That
>> doesn't really matter if you plug a low-speed device into that super
>> speed host controller, right?
>> I'm not familiar with device tree naming conventions, but is this
>> something you do for network devices?  If not, I'd not recommend it for
>> USB controllers either.
> I'd like to comment, but I wasn't cc'd on the original email so I
> don't know what is being proposed.  Pavan, can you please resend your
> question and cc devicetree-discuss and me?

Oops, never mind.  I see that it got hung up in the mailing list.
I'll clear it now.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at

[Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

Add to Google