[PATCH 30/36] PCI: Strict checking of valid range for bridge

[Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>]

children bridges busn range should be able to be allocated from parent bus range.

to avoid overlapping between sibling bridges on same bus.

Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/pci/probe.c |   24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
index c540022..5c031f0 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
@@ -801,6 +801,30 @@ reduce_needed_size:
 	return ret;
 }
 
+static int __devinit pci_bridge_check_busn_broken(struct pci_bus *bus,
+				struct pci_dev *dev,
+				int secondary, int subordinate)
+{
+	int broken = 0;
+
+	struct resource busn_res;
+	int ret;
+
+	memset(&busn_res, 0, sizeof(struct resource));
+	dev_printk(KERN_DEBUG, &dev->dev,
+		 "check if busn %02x-%02x is in busn_res: %pR\n",
+		 secondary, subordinate, &bus->busn_res);
+	ret = allocate_resource(&bus->busn_res, &busn_res,
+			 (subordinate - secondary + 1),
+			 secondary, subordinate,
+			 1, NULL, NULL);
+	if (ret)
+		broken = 1;
+	else
+		release_resource(&busn_res);
+
+	return broken;
+}
 /*
  * If it's a bridge, configure it and scan the bus behind it.
  * For CardBus bridges, we don't scan behind as the devices will
-- 
1.7.7

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html