- Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] add metadata_incore ioctl in vfs
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2011 10:42:36 +0100
- Cc: "linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Chris Mason <chris.mason@xxxxxxxxxx>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Yan, Zheng" <zheng.z.yan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "mtk.manpages@xxxxxxxxx" <mtk.manpages@xxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <1294193836.1949.384.camel@sli10-conroe>
- References: <1294119632.1949.366.camel@sli10-conroe> <201101041040.31482.arnd@xxxxxxxx> <1294193836.1949.384.camel@sli10-conroe>
- User-agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.37-rc8; KDE/4.5.1; x86_64; ; )
On Wednesday 05 January 2011 03:17:16 Shaohua Li wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 17:40 +0800, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> > Have you tried passing just a single metadata_incore_ent
> > at the ioctl and looping in user space? I would guess the
> > extra overhead of that would be small enough, but that might
> > need to be measured.
> metadata usually isn't continuous, so this means we have a lot of
> metadata_incore_ent entries. And this is called at boot time and I want
> to make the overhead as low as possible to not impact boot. Unless there
> are certain reasons we can't use indirect pointers, I'd like to make
> kernel return a vector of entries.
It's not a strict rule, but the indirect data passing is rather
ugly and I'd only do that if the difference can be /measured/.
If the purpose is to speed up boot time by preloading metadata,
the FIMETADATA_INCORE operations should of course not take a
significant amount of time compared to the actual preloading,
but as long as it's less than one percent of the time you need
for the preload, I would just use the simpler interface.
> @@ -882,6 +882,7 @@ COMPATIBLE_IOCTL(FIGETBSZ)
> /* 'X' - originally XFS but some now in the VFS */
> COMPATIBLE_IOCTL(FIFREEZE)
> COMPATIBLE_IOCTL(FITHAW)
> +COMPATIBLE_IOCTL(FIMETADATA_INCORE)
> COMPATIBLE_IOCTL(KDGETKEYCODE)
> COMPATIBLE_IOCTL(KDSETKEYCODE)
> COMPATIBLE_IOCTL(KDGKBTYPE)
This change can go away as well.
Two more general comments:
- You probably want to add the ioctls to file_ioctl instead of do_vfs_ioctl,
so you don't add another case statement to the common path.
- I don't know if there are any rules for what should be an ioctl or an
fcntl, we're rather inconsistent about this. If you have found a good
reason for making it an ioctl, just put that into the changelog so we
can refer to it next time.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Home]
[Linux USB Devel]
[Video for Linux]
[Linux Audio Users]
[Photo]
[Yosemite News]
[Yosemite Photos]
[Free Online Dating]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux SCSI]
[XFree86]