- To: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-alpha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, uclinux-dist-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-hexagon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-m32r@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-m32r-ja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-am33-list@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-parisc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-s390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-sh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, sparclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx, jejb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux390@xxxxxxxxxx, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, cmetcalf@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] Simplify the Linux kernel by reducing its state space
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2012 11:11:15 -0700
- In-reply-to: <20120401100448.GD14848@liondog.tnic>
- Reply-to: paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Sun, Apr 01, 2012 at 12:04:48PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 01, 2012 at 12:33:21AM +0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > Although there have been numerous complaints about the complexity of
> > parallel programming (especially over the past 5-10 years), the plain
> > truth is that the incremental complexity of parallel programming over
> > that of sequential programming is not as large as is commonly believed.
> > Despite that you might have heard, the mind-numbing complexity of modern
> > computer systems is not due so much to there being multiple CPUs, but
> > rather to there being any CPUs at all. In short, for the ultimate in
> > computer-system simplicity, the optimal choice is NR_CPUS=0.
> >
> > This commit therefore limits kernel builds to zero CPUs. This change
> > has the beneficial side effect of rendering all kernel bugs harmless.
> > Furthermore, this commit enables additional beneficial changes, for
> > example, the removal of those parts of the kernel that are not needed
> > when there are zero CPUs.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Looks good, thanks for doing that.
>
> Btw, I just got confirmation from hw folk that we can actually give you
> hardware support for that code with an upcoming CPU which has NR_CPUS=0
> cores.
>
> Oh, and additionally, we can disable some of those so getting into the
> negative is also doable from the hw perspective, so feel free to explore
> that side of the problem too.
>
> ACK.
Cute! ;-)
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-alpha" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Netdev]
[Linux Wireless]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Security]
[Linux for Hams]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Yosemite]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux RAID]
[Linux Admin]
[Samba]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux Resources]