On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 10:10:12AM +1300, Michael Cree wrote:
> On 12/01/11 18:29, Matt Turner wrote:
>> On boot-up of my UP1500, I see
>>
>> HWRPB cycle frequency bogus. Estimated 796423805 Hz
>> Trying to install interrupt handler for IRQ8
>> ------------[ cut here ]------------
>> WARNING: at kernel/softirq.c:138 __local_bh_enable+0xa8/0xc0()
>
> I don't think that's related to the __do_IRQ removal. It occurs in the
> 2.6.37 kernel just released. Was discussed on linux-alpha with no
> resolution; see
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-alpha&m=128859282018188&w=2 and following
> messages in thread.
Fixed, the patch will follow shortly.
>> Ivan, the last patch in my tree is a breakage fix that you proposed.
>> It seems fine to me; can you please give your sign-off?
>
> The commit message should give more information. How about the following?
>
> Commit df9ee29270 made arch_local_irq_save and arch_local_irq_restore
> static inline which with -Werror trips up on __set_hae() and _set_hae()
> which are extern inline. The naive solution is to make __set_hae() and
> set_hae() static inline but for reasons described in commit d559d4a24a3fe
> this breaks the generic kernel build. Instead, since this is architecture
> specific code, this patch hard wires in the architecture specific method of
> disabling and enabling interrupts.
Agreed, that would be nice description.
> You can also add my Tested-by (I tested on generic, miata and dp264 kernel
> builds).
Matt, feel free to add
Signed-off-by: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Ivan.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-alpha" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Netdev]
[Linux Wireless]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Security]
[Linux for Hams]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Yosemite]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux RAID]
[Linux Admin]
[Samba]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux Resources]