Re: [RFC trollpatch 1/1] genirq: Remove the fits all and nothing __do_IRQ() code

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 12:01:51PM -0700, Luck, Tony wrote:
> > Hmm, why isn't chip->unmask() sufficient ?
> That's a good question.  I'll take a look at what ia64 is doing
> in the ->unmask() and ->end() functions to see if I can fix this
> with some code shuffling.

Did you end up solving this? ia64 iosapic and parisc iosapic still look
fairly similar... I hit the same issue of ->end() not being called in
the handle_level_irq path and ended up just folding in the missing bit
to ->unmask (we were already EOI the IOSAPIC, but missing the EOI for
the parisc cpu.)

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-alpha" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at

[Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux Resources]

Powered by Linux