Re: System freezes after "could not getpeername"
|[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]|
Am 30.08.2010 11:01, schrieb terry white:
... ciao: : on "8-30-2010" "Andreas Moroder" writ: : but there seems to be a correlation between the getpeername call in inted and : the freeze of the machine, so I prefer to avoid inetd in this case . i tend to think that solution cosmetic at best, and at worst, a misdirected effort. my reading of the 'inetd' manpage does not suggest it calls 'getpeername', but insteat hands off connections to implied servers. seems to me, 'getpeername' is more likely local to the answering server, that's just a quess though. "having" to bypass inetd, is expedient, but not an elegant solution. for my part, i'd start looking at bind ...
Hello Terry,I am sure you are right that this is not the solution but I hope that this way we have more time to find the true source of problems.
out of our logilfe: inetd: could not getpeername according to this on other OSes getpeername is used http://fxr.googlebit.com/source/usr.sbin/inetd/inetd.c?v=OPENBSD-CURRENT so I suppose that this is true for linux too that inetd uses getpeername. Could you please explain me why you would start to look at bind ? One strange thing we also see on the machine ist that/proc/sys/fs/file-nr is constantly growing. May it be that getpeername did stop to work because it needed a filehandle and did not get it ?
Thanks Andreas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-admin" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html