2010/6/8 Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@xxxxxxx>:
>> 2010/6/8 Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@xxxxxxx>:
>>> Are you sure it's not because of some NATing which may have a shorter
>>> timeout then the one used by SSH's keep alive?
>
> query <query.cdac@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> I am not 100% sure but during the connection dropout time , the CPU
>> is 100% busy as shown
>> by our own reporting utility. Reg NAT ing , I don't think so those
>> hosts are behind NAT
>> as there was no requirement like that for those hosts to access
>> Internet . Anyway , I will
>> confirm regarding this from the network-admin .
>>
>> P.S: Is there is any utility that can tell us whether we are behind
>> NAT or not .
>
> If “ifconfig” on one host gives you different IP addresses then the
> other host see as incoming IP then you are behind NAT.
>
Sorry , I failed to understand the above statement . But I have
something in mind , I will try it tomorrow .
>From the source machine , I send a packet to remote host on a
different network . Now If I capture packet on the remote host and
it comes out to be different ip address than the source host , then
probably I am behind NAT. These hosts are having private ip address.
Will it help to help me know whether I am behind NAT ?
> There may be some other services that close the connection like
> firewalls and some such. You should consult if there are any on the
> path and whether thous could drop connections with your network
> administrator.
>
> Also Glynn's suggestion of making keep alive timeout shorter may work.
>
> I find it hard to believe that high CPU usage could cause connection
> dropping unless you have some *really* busy machine but then you should
> consider upgrading hardware or rethinking what services those serves
> provide.
These hosts are not providing any Internet service and mainly
responsible for processing around Gigabits of data . The processing
continues for around 24 hours ,
During the processing , it utilizes around 100% CPU for around 4 hours
and the connection drop happened during that time . Not sure what
processig goes on during the time which takes all the CPU . The user
we are talking here is the user under whom these processes runs .
Hope it helps to understand the scenario .
>
> --
> Best regards, _ _
> .o. | Liege of Serenly Enlightened Majesty of o' \,=./ `o
> ..o | Computer Science, Michal "mina86" Nazarewicz (o o)
> ooo +--<mina86-tlen.pl>--<jid:mina86-jabber.org>--ooO--(_)--Ooo--
>
Thanks
Zaman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-admin" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Linux Newbie]
[Audio]
[Hams]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Util Linux NG]
[Security]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Yosemite Photos]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Linux Device Drivers]
[Samba]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Git]
[Linux Resources]
[Fedora Users]