Re: [PATCH] ACPI: Flag use of ACPI and ACPI idioms for power supplies to regulator API

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Monday, January 27, 2014 12:44:34 AM Mark Brown wrote:
> 
> --QgvTbcZPsSS/HkXe
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Disposition: inline
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> 
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 01:54:49AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Monday, January 27, 2014 12:32:14 AM Mark Brown wrote:
> 
> > > @@ -509,6 +510,14 @@ void __init acpi_early_init(void)
> > >  		goto error0;
> > >  	}
> > > =20
> > > +	/*
> > > +	 * If the system is using ACPI then we can be reasonably
> > > +	 * confident that any regulators are managed by the firmware
> > > +	 * so tell the regulator core it has everything it needs to
> > > +	 * know.
> > > +	 */
> > > +	regulator_has_full_constraints();
> > > +
> 
> > That's going to be called earlier than it use to be in 3.13 and before.
> 
> > No problems with that?
> 
> All that function does is to set a flag - so long as we can assign to a
> static variable it should be OK.

OK, do you want me to take it?

Rafael

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux