RE: [PATCH] ACPI, APEI, EINJ, limit the range of einj_param

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

> After combination the opinions from Ying and Tony, the current fix is the
> simplest. Any other changes will make codes more complex. So I prefer to
> keep current style. What's your opinion?

Not sure which one you mean as "the current fix" (they are both one line,
adding a check for param_extension - so neither looks simpler than the
other :-).

My opinion is that Ying's suggestion to make einj_get_parameter_address()
return NULL is the right one.



[Site Home]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Rubini]     [Photo]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux