RE: [PATCH] ACPI, APEI, EINJ, limit the range of einj_param

["Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>]

> After combination the opinions from Ying and Tony, the current fix is the
> simplest. Any other changes will make codes more complex. So I prefer to
> keep current style. What's your opinion?

Not sure which one you mean as "the current fix" (they are both one line,
adding a check for param_extension - so neither looks simpler than the
other :-).

My opinion is that Ying's suggestion to make einj_get_parameter_address()
return NULL is the right one.

-Tony

��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{�����ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f