[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Google
  Web www.spinics.net

Re: SDCC porting feasibility study, part 1: the assembler



On 02/27/12 15:42, Brad Normand wrote:
---snip---
ACK is kind of a wildcard that might fit somewhere in-between any of
this depending on what exactly it is, but we already know it has some
issues.  It does presumably work though.

I have read up on how ACK works, from some of the whitepapers on the site. The 6502 code generator's output is absolutely nightmarish. ACK apparently uses a not-so-grand intermediate representation that is responsible for it not being that good at generating code.

Writing our own toolchain... eech.  Might have been a neat idea back
in the 80's.

Where did all these other toolchains come from, anyway? As far as I am aware (trust me, bcc is pretty hard to find solid information about), the Dev86 toolchain was pretty much just Bruce Evans' work up until the point that the Linux-8086 crew grabbed it and beefed it up further. It might be yucky, but even if yucky, it's an option that would work.

Jody Bruchon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-8086" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Kernel]     [Linux ia64]     [DCCP]     [Linux for ARM]     [Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Architecture]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

Add to Google Powered by Linux