|[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]|
----- Original Message ----- From: "JBRUCHON" <jbruchon@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <linux-8086@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2007 10:11 PM Subject: Re: New user wanting to help
I'm sort of the current maintainer of the site and the project, but have no access to the mailing list setup at all.I'm a fairly busy person so I don't do much without being asked to do it, and my web-fu sucks pretty bad.
Sorry Jody, I don't want to sound nasty since I have done 0% contribution myself but we shouldn't have to tell you to add a link. When somebody like Bram Lohman emails the list that he has Elks running on an emulator and that is it freely available to download than you as the site admin should, as a bare minimum, add the link without one of us telling you to do so.
Since you are very busy (which I fully understand) can I suggest you share the admin details with a few more people or better speak to Mario to get a wiki page added.
Back to work :-) Regards, Hans. www.ht-lab.com
If you want something in particular done, give me the resources and I'll get it done.Ben Weiss wrote:--- Hans <hans64@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:I am a bit disappointed that Rask Lambertsen's GCCport and the Dioscuri emulator (which runs ELKS!) are not mentioned on the website, come on guys, it can't be that much work to add some hyperlinks...This seems like the easiest thing to fix first, and makes the project "look" better, so I'd be happy to provide some updates to the site. Not too much for now, just keeping with static pages- fixing broken links, adding some (ie Rasks's port), etc. Does anyone know who needs to be contacted to update the archive mentioned on vger.kernel.org? Is this list still even being archived, or do we have to "sign up" for it? (If so, gmane comes to mind...)Compiling ELKS under GCC is not going to beeasy but IMHO will be very beneficial for the wider embedded user community andhence will/might increase the popularity of ELKS.Sounds like great minds think alike :) Not only is GCC much more popular and continuously maintained, but apparently GCC (GAS, rather) uses AT&T syntax, and BCC uses Intel syntax. Since Linux uses GCC, it follows that modifying/porting to ELKS would be easier if we also use GCC. -Ben ____________________________________________________________________________________ Get easy, one-click access to your favorites. Make Yahoo! your homepage. http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-8086" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-8086" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-8086" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html