| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
On 9 Sep 2002, Jean Francois Martinez wrote: >> They were never added to Xconfigurator either. About the only RFE >> I would have is Include xf86cfg, or at least ALL the functionality it has. >> I'm usually using newer versions of X/DRI and the kernel. I usebuild the >> SRPM and build myself (and don't file bugs since my setup is unsupported:) >> >> >features. Otherwise people would use it and then say "damn, this >> >sucks, I'll just use Xconsuckurator instead" and the problem >> >never gets fixed. >> > >> > >> I always thoughh Xconfigurator sucked too.I liked XF86Setup. >> It had problems, but looked like a good start. >> > >My experience (who dates from the Halloween release and spans at least a >dozen cards) with Xconfigurator was that it ever made a breeze >configuring X and since the moment I got a PCI box, it was still easier >since it autodetected the card(and in latest releases the monitor >too). For the XFree tools since I am a >politically uncorrect person I don't mind telling the emperor is naked >and the XFree tools being two pieces of crap with poor user interfaces, >often failing to provide a working configuration and who get me strictly >nothing that I cannot get far easier and faster with Xconfigurator plus >xvidtune. My grip with RedHat is that they haven't made a better front >end to xvidtune like the one shipped in Suse. Put that in bugzilla! ;o) Feature request for redhat-config-xfree86. It is a completely sensible feature request, and indeed would be nice to have in some future redhat-config-xfree86 package release. -- Mike A. Harris ftp://people.redhat.com/mharris OS Systems Engineer XFree86 maintainer Red Hat Inc. _______________________________________________ Limbo-list mailing list Limbo-list@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/limbo-list
[Kernel] [Red Hat Install] [Red Hat Development] [Gimp] [Yosemite News]