Re: Upgrades

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Chris Kloiber wrote:

>On Tue, 2002-09-03 at 22:39, Elton Woo wrote:
>  
>
>>Mike A. Harris wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>systems when people upgrade their OS from one release to the 
>>>next.  Alternatively, we'd have to either remove a major chunk of 
>>>the software packages in the distribution in order to free up 
>>>more engineering resources, or we'd have to release distribution 
>>>releases every 12-18 months instead of every 4-6 months or so.
>>>
>>>We understand completely the thousands of things that "would be 
>>>nice" if Red Hat could do them, but quite simply - we can't.  Or 
>>> 
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>    Considering that there is a lot more new hardware coming out, why
>>is the cycle 4-6 months, rather than 12 -18 months? IMHO, the longer
>>cycle would allow RH to test and support more and newer hardware
>>configurations than with the (current?) shorter cycle?  
>>    
>>
>
>Aha! You've been reading about "Red Hat Advanced Server" haven't you?
>
>http://www.redhat.com/software/advancedserver/features/
>
>  
>
    huh? er, actually, *no*... the thought simply occurred to me. Now 
that you
have mentioned it, I guess I better read _and educate myself_. Thanks!

Elton ;-)

-- 
eltonwoo@videotron.ca - ICQ #149608718 - Montreal (Quebec), CANADA.
  "You only live once, so let's make life EASIER for each other."
  LINUX Registered User #193975. AMD-K7 ATHLON CPU power on board.
       

		
  







_______________________________________________
Limbo-list mailing list
Limbo-list@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/limbo-list

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel]     [Red General Discussion]     [Red Hat Install]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux