Chris Kloiber wrote: >On Tue, 2002-09-03 at 22:39, Elton Woo wrote: > > >>Mike A. Harris wrote: >> >> >> >>>systems when people upgrade their OS from one release to the >>>next. Alternatively, we'd have to either remove a major chunk of >>>the software packages in the distribution in order to free up >>>more engineering resources, or we'd have to release distribution >>>releases every 12-18 months instead of every 4-6 months or so. >>> >>>We understand completely the thousands of things that "would be >>>nice" if Red Hat could do them, but quite simply - we can't. Or >>> >>> >>> >>> >> Considering that there is a lot more new hardware coming out, why >>is the cycle 4-6 months, rather than 12 -18 months? IMHO, the longer >>cycle would allow RH to test and support more and newer hardware >>configurations than with the (current?) shorter cycle? >> >> > >Aha! You've been reading about "Red Hat Advanced Server" haven't you? > >http://www.redhat.com/software/advancedserver/features/ > > > huh? er, actually, *no*... the thought simply occurred to me. Now that you have mentioned it, I guess I better read _and educate myself_. Thanks! Elton ;-) -- eltonwoo@videotron.ca - ICQ #149608718 - Montreal (Quebec), CANADA. "You only live once, so let's make life EASIER for each other." LINUX Registered User #193975. AMD-K7 ATHLON CPU power on board. _______________________________________________ Limbo-list mailing list Limbo-list@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/limbo-list