Re: Re: LARTC Digest, Vol 34, Issue 12

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

"m.a.t.e.o" wrote:
>      #######
>      for the MAC address: M0M1M2M3M4M5
>      tc filter add dev eth1 parent 1: protocol ip prio 5 u32
>      match u16 0x0800
>      0xffff at -2 match u16 0x4455 0xffff at -4 match u32
>      0x00112233 0xffffffff
>      at -8 flowid 1:40
>      #######

Have you tried "protocol all" rather than "protocol ip"?  I tested
M0M1M2M3M4M5 (a long time ago) and it did work for eth1 and imq0.

I guess that when the interface it was used on "saw" the MAC specified
by it then I got a match.  It did not work when the machine was too far
away (in # hops), probably because then the MAC is no longer "visible".

In short, M0M1M2M3M4M5 matched any computer on my internal LAN and the
gateway of my ISP but nothing else.
LARTC mailing list

[Bugtraq]     [Fedora Legacy]     [GCC Help]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [IP Tables]     [Netfilter Devel]     [Fedora Users]

Powered by Linux