Re: HFSC and that ATM overhead problem (Another VOIP QoS post. Ahhhh) | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
On Sun, 4 Nov 2007 12:46:37 +0000 Gustavo Homem <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I don't use Shorewall, but rather an iptables script which works for > most scenarios: No disrespect, but that sounds too scary for me. I feel more comfortable if something like Shorewall is holding my hand. > That is, start with the value the modem is synchronized for, fill the > line with the average traffic you expect and lower the values until > is OK. As you lower the upstream value you will find increasingly > better latency values (try with ping + voip app). Thanks for the explanation. > doesn't scale for using across multiple systems of > different versions. I didn't understand that bit. What are the "systems" and "versions"? Regards Fog_Watch. -- Lose wait. Get Gentoo. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc