Re: Clock Source Kernel settings in 2.6.22
|[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]|
[Please keep me in CC/To, I don't read lartc often] Mario Antonio Garcia wrote:
I used to get an average of 18900kbit. My hope was that these new patches would bring better accuracy.
Well, you're up from 94.5% to 99.95%, so they seem to do :)
Notice the 24 cburst. I am just trying to compensate the inaccuracy this way. If I remove the cburst, obviously the shape rate I get goes down.Perhaps I am missing something. I am just a novice trying to get exact bandwidth shaping. I have tested all the clock source types with no good results.
A couple of comments: - The patches so far only improve things on x86 - Try to test using UDP (not sure if you did) or simply a ping flood, TCP is not ideal. - iproute calculates burst values automatically. With the higher precision clock source you can use a smaller value (also done automatically if you don't specify them). - HFSC is more precise than HTB (and not the least more complicated to configure if you use only linear service curves) _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc