On Sun, 13 May 2012 13:20:46 +0300
Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I don't feel that the savings is worth the extra complication. We save
> two pages per memslot here.
Using a 4KB vmalloced page for a 16B array is ...
Actually I felt like you before and did not do this, but recently there
was a talk about creating hundreds of memslots.
> What about using kvmalloc() instead of vmalloc()? It's in
> security/apparmor now, but can be made generic.
Andrew once, maybe some times, rejected making such an API generic saying
that there should not be a generic criterion by which we can decide which
function - vmalloc() or kmalloc() - to use.
So each caller should decide by its own criteria.
In this case, we need to implement kvm specific kvmalloc().
BTW, we are already doing this for dirty_bitmap.
Thanks,
Takuya
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[KVM ARM]
[KVM ia64]
[KVM ppc]
[Spice Development]
[Libvirt]
[Libvirt Users]
[Linux USB Devel]
[Video for Linux]
[Linux Audio Users]
[Photo]
[Yosemite News]
[Yosemite Photos]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux SCSI]
[XFree86]