On 05/09/2012 04:05 PM, Chegu Vinod wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On an 8 socket Westmere host I am attempting to run a single guest and
> characterize the virtualization overhead for a system intensive
> workload (AIM7-high_systime) as the size of the guest scales (10way/64G,
> 20way/128G, ... 80way/512G).
>
> To do some comparisons between the native vs. guest runs. I have
> been using "numactl" to control the cpu node & memory node bindings for
> the qemu instance. For larger guest sizes I end up binding across multiple
> localities. for e.g. a 40 way guest :
>
> numactl --cpunodebind=0,1,2,3 --membind=0,1,2,3 \
> qemu-system-x86_64 -smp 40 -m 262144 \
> <....>
>
> I understand that actual mappings from a guest virtual address to host physical
> address could change.
>
> Is there a way to determine [at a given instant] which host's NUMA node is
> providing the backing physical memory for the active guest's kernel and
> also for the the apps actively running in the guest ?
>
> Guessing that there is a better way (some tool available?) than just
> diff'ng the per node memory usage...from the before and after output of
> "numactl --hardware" on the host.
>
Not sure if that's what you want, but there's Documentation/vm/pagemap.txt.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[KVM ARM]
[KVM ia64]
[KVM ppc]
[Spice Development]
[Libvirt]
[Libvirt Users]
[Linux USB Devel]
[Video for Linux]
[Linux Audio Users]
[Photo]
[Yosemite News]
[Yosemite Photos]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux SCSI]
[XFree86]