On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 01:04:13PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 04/09/2012 10:46 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > Perhaps the mmu_lock hold times by get_dirty are a large component here?
>
> That's my concern, because it affects the scaling of migration for wider
> guests.
>
> > If that can be alleviated, not only RO->RW faults benefit.
>
> Those are the most common types of faults on modern hardware, no?
Depends on your workload, of course. If there is memory pressure,
0->PRESENT might be very frequent. My point is that reduction of
mmu_lock contention is a good thing overall.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[KVM ARM]
[KVM ia64]
[KVM ppc]
[Spice Development]
[Libvirt]
[Libvirt Users]
[Linux USB Devel]
[Video for Linux]
[Linux Audio Users]
[Photo]
[Yosemite News]
[Yosemite Photos]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux SCSI]
[XFree86]