On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 10:40:14PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 10:33:54PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > > We don't try to match what HV does 100% anyway.
> > >
> > We should. The same code will be used for HV.
>
> Only where it makes sense, that is where the functionality
> is sufficiently similar.
>
You can sprinkle additional ifs in the code, but I do not see the point.
> > > > We have to notify IOAPIC about EOI ASAP. It
> > > > may hold another interrupt for us that has to be delivered.
> > >
> > > You mean the ack notifiers? We can skip just for the vectors
> > > which have ack notifiers or only if there are no notifiers.
> > >
> > No. I mean:
> >
> > if (!ent->fields.mask && (ioapic->irr & (1 << i)))
> > ioapic_service(ioapic, i);
>
> Hmm.
--
Gleb.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[KVM ARM]
[KVM ia64]
[KVM ppc]
[Spice Development]
[Libvirt]
[Libvirt Users]
[Linux USB Devel]
[Video for Linux]
[Linux Audio Users]
[Photo]
[Yosemite News]
[Yosemite Photos]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux SCSI]
[XFree86]