On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 8:11 PM, Gleb Natapov <gleb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 05:38:40PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> On 04/05/2012 04:57 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > May be it used NMI based profiling. We should ask oprofile developers.
>> > > As I said I am almost sure my inability to run it on a host is probably
>> > > PEBKAC, although I ran the same script exactly on the host and the
>> > > guest (the script is from the first email of this thread)
>> > >
>> > After upgrading the kernel to latest git from whatever it was there the
>> > same script works and counts CPU_CLK_UNHALT events.
>> >
>>
>> This is even while it violates the Intel guidelines?
>>
> Yes, but who says the result is correct :) It seems that we handle
> global ctrl msr wrong. That is counter can be enabled either in global
> ctrl or in eventsel. Trying to confirm that.
>
if that becomes true then will global ctrl msr have any significance ?
> --
> Gleb.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[KVM ARM]
[KVM ia64]
[KVM ppc]
[Spice Development]
[Libvirt]
[Libvirt Users]
[Linux USB Devel]
[Video for Linux]
[Linux Audio Users]
[Photo]
[Yosemite News]
[Yosemite Photos]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux SCSI]
[XFree86]