Re: [PATCH RFC V6 0/11] Paravirtualized ticketlocks -- Linux KVM


Re: [PATCH RFC V6 0/11] Paravirtualized ticketlocks
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC V6 0/11] Paravirtualized ticketlocks
From: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2012 19:26:25 +0530
Cc: Alan Meadows <alan.meadows@xxxxxxxxx>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@xxxxxxxxxx>, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@xxxxxxxxxx>, KVM <kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Xen Devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>, Virtualization <virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@xxxxxxxxxx>, Stephan Diestelhorst <stephan.diestelhorst@xxxxxxx>, Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Attilio Rao <attilio.rao@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <4F785DCF.7020809@redhat.com>
Organization: IBM
References: <20120321102041.473.61069.sendpatchset@codeblue.in.ibm.com> <4F707C5F.1000905@redhat.com> <4F716E31.3000803@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <CAMy5W3foop40+R1RLv_JPhnO5ZmV90uMmNERYY-e3QCeaJfqLw@mail.gmail.com> <4F73568D.7000703@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4F743247.5080407@redhat.com> <4F74A405.2040609@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4F7585EE.7060203@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4F7855A1.80107@redhat.com> <4F785CC9.7070204@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4F785DCF.7020809@redhat.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.1

On 04/01/2012 07:23 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:

On 04/01/2012 04:48 PM, Raghavendra K T wrote:

I have patch something like below in mind to try:


I'm interested in how PLE does vs. your patches, both with PLE enabled
and disabled.


Sure. will update with the experimental results.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

References:
- [PATCH RFC V6 0/11] Paravirtualized ticketlocks
  - From: Raghavendra K T
- Re: [PATCH RFC V6 0/11] Paravirtualized ticketlocks
  - From: Avi Kivity
- Re: [PATCH RFC V6 0/11] Paravirtualized ticketlocks
  - From: Raghavendra K T
- Re: [PATCH RFC V6 0/11] Paravirtualized ticketlocks
  - From: Raghavendra K T
- Re: [PATCH RFC V6 0/11] Paravirtualized ticketlocks
  - From: Avi Kivity
- Re: [PATCH RFC V6 0/11] Paravirtualized ticketlocks
  - From: Raghavendra K T
- Re: [PATCH RFC V6 0/11] Paravirtualized ticketlocks
  - From: Raghavendra K T
- Re: [PATCH RFC V6 0/11] Paravirtualized ticketlocks
  - From: Avi Kivity
- Re: [PATCH RFC V6 0/11] Paravirtualized ticketlocks
  - From: Raghavendra K T
- Re: [PATCH RFC V6 0/11] Paravirtualized ticketlocks
  - From: Avi Kivity

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH RFC V6 0/11] Paravirtualized ticketlocks
Next by Date: [Bug 42779] KVM domain hangs after loading initrd with Xenomai kernel
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH RFC V6 0/11] Paravirtualized ticketlocks
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH RFC V6 0/11] Paravirtualized ticketlocks
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[KVM ARM] [KVM ia64] [KVM ppc] [Spice Development] [Libvirt] [Libvirt Users] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Photo] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [XFree86]