Re: [PATCH 08 of 11] anon-vma-rwsem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

On Thu, 8 May 2008, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:

> Hi Andrew,
> On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 03:59:14PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > 	CPU0:			CPU1:
> > 
> > 	spin_lock(global_lock)	
> > 	spin_lock(a->lock);	spin_lock(b->lock);
> 				================== mmu_notifier_register()

If mmy_notifier_register() takes the global lock, it cannot happen here. 
It will be blocked (by CPU0), so there's no way it can then cause an ABBA 
deadlock. It will be released when CPU0 has taken *all* the locks it 
needed to take.

> What we can do is to replace the mm_lock with a
> spin_lock(&global_lock) only if all places that takes i_mmap_lock


You replace mm_lock() with the sequence that Andrew gave you (and I 

	.. get all locks UNORDERED ..

and you're now done. You have your "mm_lock()" (which still needs to be 
renamed - it should be a "mmu_notifier_lock()" or something like that), 
but you don't need the insane sorting. At most you apparently need a way 
to recognize duplicates (so that you don't deadlock on yourself), which 
looks like a simple bit-per-vma.

The global lock doesn't protect any data structures itself - it just 
protects two of these mm_lock() functions from ABBA'ing on each other!


This email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
kvm-devel mailing list

[Site Home]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Virtualization]     [LVS Devel]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Memory]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Rubini]     [100% Free Internet Dating]     [Photo]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux Resources]

Powered by Linux