Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/4] [PATCH] introduce QEMUAccel and fill it with interrupt specific driver

[Paul Brook <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> > Maybe 'VCPU' would be a clearer name?  QEMU provides its own VCPU, and
> > KQEMU+QEMU also provide one toegether.  While KVM provides essentially
> > one or more whole VCPUs by itself and uses QEMU's drivers only doesn't
> > it?
> >
> > -- Jamie
>
> VCPU is rather confusing with the vcpus themselves. KVM, for instance,
> has its own structures called "vcpu".
>
> If it is preferred, however, we can name the structure VCPUOperations,
> and change the function names that involves accel_yyy to vcpu_op_yyy()

kvm wants to hook into more than just the CPU doesn't it?

Paul

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list
kvm-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel