Re: [patch 2/2] QEMU: decrease console "refresh rate" with -nographic

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Avi Kivity wrote:
>> Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>>
>>> BTW, when we set O_ASYNC on the tap fd, we're eliminating 
>>> O_NONBLOCK.  This means that we have to poll loop select() when 
>>> readv()'ing packets instead of just reading until hitting AGAIN.  
>>> This means at least an extra syscall per packet.
>>
>> I didn't know that O_ASYNC and O_NONBLOCK were mutually exclusive.  
>> Can you point me at the relevant documentation?
>
> I don't know that they are, but we're doing an:
>
> fcntl(fd, F_SETFL, O_ASYNC);
>
> F_SETFL is not additive so the previous O_NONBLOCK gets dropped.
>

Ah, I thought it's something fundamental I'm missing.  The above is just 
a bug.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list
kvm-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel

[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Virtualization]     [LVS Devel]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]

  Powered by Linux