Google
  Web www.spinics.net

[PATCH] x86: fix description of __fls(): __fls(0) is undefined

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


Ricardo M. Correia spotted that the use of __fls() in fls64() did
not seem to make sense. In fact fls64()'s implementation is fine,
but the description of __fls() was wrong. Fix that.

Reported-by: "Ricardo M. Correia" <Ricardo.M.Correia@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@xxxxxxxxxxx>

---

On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 05:56:37PM +0100, Ricardo M. Correia wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I have a question about fls64() which I hope you or someone else could
> clarify, please see below.
> 
> On Sáb, 2008-03-15 at 18:32 +0100, Alexander van Heukelum wrote: 
> > +#elif BITS_PER_LONG == 64
> > +static inline int fls64(__u64 x)
> > +{
> > +	if (x == 0)
> > +		return 0;
> > +	return __fls(x) + 1;
> > +}
> 
> It seems fls64() is implemented on top of __fls(), however the __fls()
> implementation on the x86-64 architecture states that the result is
> undefined if the argument does not have any zero bits.

You have found a bug. It's not in fls64, though, but a copy/paste
one in the comment preceding __fls(). __fls() gives an undefined
result if there are no _set_ bits: only __fls(0) gives an undefined
result.

The inconsistency is well-spotted, though, thanks.

Patch is against current -tip.

Greetings,
    Alexander

> So if I understand correctly, the statement "fls64(~0ULL)" would return
> an undefined result on x64-64 instead of 64 as one would expect.
> 
> Wouldn't it make sense to check for ~0ULL in fls64()?
> 
> Thanks,
> Ricardo

---

diff --git a/include/asm-x86/bitops.h b/include/asm-x86/bitops.h
index 96b1829..cfb2b64 100644
--- a/include/asm-x86/bitops.h
+++ b/include/asm-x86/bitops.h
@@ -356,7 +356,7 @@ static inline unsigned long ffz(unsigned long word)
  * __fls: find last set bit in word
  * @word: The word to search
  *
- * Undefined if no zero exists, so code should check against ~0UL first.
+ * Undefined if no set bit exists, so code should check against 0 first.
  */
 static inline unsigned long __fls(unsigned long word)
 {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Site Home]     [Other Archives]     [Linux Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel Testers]     [Linux SH]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Kbuild]     [Linux Tape]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Kernel Janitors]     [Linux Doc]     [Linux Man Pages]     [Linux Standards]     [Kernel Announce]     [Memory]     [Netdev]     [Git]     [Linux PCI]     [NUMA]     [Netfilter]     [Netfilter Devel]     [SELinux]     [Bugtraq]     [Writing Drivers]     [Linux Serial]     [Linux PPP]     [Kernel MM Commits]     [Linux Security Module]     [Ext4]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser FS]     [Fastboot]     [Linux RT Users]     [Linux Virtualization]     [LVS Devel]     [KVM]     [KVM PPC]     [KVM ia64]     [Linux Containers]     [Util Linux NG]     [Sk Drivers]     [Wireless]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Embedded Linux]     [Sparse]     [Linux Arch]     [Linux ACPI]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux OpenGL]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux DCCP]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux USB]     [Large Format Photos]     [DVD Store]     [Tux]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux PA RISC]     [MIPS Linux]     [S390 Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [ARM Kernel]     [Sparc Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Sound]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux SMP]     [Linux AXP]     [Linux Alpha]     [Linux M68K]     [Linux ia64]     [Linux 8086]     [Linux x86_64]     [Linux Apps]     [Linux X.25]     [Linux Crypto]     [DM Crypt]     [LInux Btrace]     [Utrace Devel]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Resources]     [Older Kernel Mail]

Add to Google Powered by Linux

Google PageRank Checking tool