Re: [PATCH v2 12/29] nios2: Interrupt handling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday 15 July 2014 16:45:39 Ley Foon Tan wrote:
> +#ifndef _ASM_NIOS2_IRQ_H
> +#define _ASM_NIOS2_IRQ_H
> +
> +#define NIOS2_CPU_NR_IRQS	32
> +/* Reserve 32 additional interrupts for GPIO IRQs */
> +#define NR_IRQS			(NIOS2_CPU_NR_IRQS + 32)

Is this intentional? I would expect that you use SPARSE_IRQ
instead and not define NR_IRQS.

> +#ifndef NO_IRQ
> +#define NO_IRQ			(-1)
> +#endif

New architectures should no longer define NO_IRQ. Please fix all users
you encounter instead.

> diff --git a/arch/nios2/kernel/irq.c b/arch/nios2/kernel/irq.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..8770d50
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/nios2/kernel/irq.c
> +#include <linux/init.h>
> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>

Maybe move this into drivers/irqchip/? Probably doesn't matter either way,
your choice.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/




[Index of Archives]

  Powered by Linux

[Older Kernel Discussion]     [Yosemite National Park Forum]     [Large Format Photos]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Stuff]     [Index of Other Archives]