Re: [PATCH 1/8] ntp: Fix STA_INS/DEL clearing bug

[John Stultz <johnstul@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 07/12/2012 10:58 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * John Stultz <john.stultz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > From: John Stultz <johnstul@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > In commit 6b43ae8a619d17c4935c3320d2ef9e92bdeed05d, I
> > introduced a bug that kept the STA_INS or STA_DEL bit
> > from being cleared from time_status via adjtimex()
> > without forcing STA_PLL first.
> >
> > Usually once the STA_INS is set, it isn't cleared
> > until the leap second is applied, so its unlikely this
> > affected anyone. However during testing I noticed it
> > took some effort to cancel a leap second once STA_INS
> > was set.
> >
> > This issue affects 3.4 and up.
> >
> > Since this isn't urgent (issue is only observed in testing,
> > the behavior doesn't affect ntpd, nor is a leapsecond due
> > for at least ~6 months), and we're late in the 3.5-rc
> > cycle, I'm holding this off for 3.6 merge window,
> > where I'll then backport to 3.5-stable and 3.4-stable.
>
> > CC: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> We generally don't do such a workflow. Either it's valid for
> tip:timers/urgent and it can have a -stable tag, or it should
> not be backported, and not have a -stable tag.
>
> The rule is: if it's important enough for -stable then it's
> doubly important for the current -rc kernel!

Ok. My concern here was that if the time/hrtimer leapsecond changes were 
possibly too large for merging this late in 3.5-rc, I didn't want to add 
anything more to that queue.

So if you're comfortable pushing this one upstream for 3.5-rc, I'd be 
happy to have it merged sooner.

thanks
-john

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/