RE: [PATCH v2] regulator: tps65217: Fix voltage boundary checking in tps65217_pmic_map_voltage

["AnilKumar, Chimata" <anilkumar@xxxxxx>]

Hi Axel,

Thanks for the patch

Acked-by: AnilKumar Ch <anilkumar@xxxxxx>

On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 12:49:33, Axel Lin wrote:
> It is ok to request voltage with min_uV < tps->info[rid]->min_uV and
> max_uV > tps->info[rid]->max_uV.
> 
> The equation we used in uv_to_vsel() does not allow
> min_uV < tps->info[rid]->min_uV, otherwise it returns negative selector.
> So we need to set min_uV = tps->info[rid]->min_uV if
> min_uV < tps->info[rid]->min_uV.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/regulator/tps65217-regulator.c |    6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/tps65217-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/tps65217-regulator.c
> index 0a3df5b..f7d0495 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/tps65217-regulator.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/tps65217-regulator.c
> @@ -206,10 +206,10 @@ static int tps65217_pmic_map_voltage(struct regulator_dev *dev,
>  	if (rid < TPS65217_DCDC_1 || rid > TPS65217_LDO_4)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> -	if (min_uV < tps->info[rid]->min_uV || min_uV > tps->info[rid]->max_uV)
> -		return -EINVAL;
> +	if (min_uV < tps->info[rid]->min_uV)
> +		min_uV = tps->info[rid]->min_uV;
>  
> -	if (max_uV < tps->info[rid]->min_uV || max_uV > tps->info[rid]->max_uV)
> +	if (max_uV < tps->info[rid]->min_uV || min_uV > tps->info[rid]->max_uV)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	ret = tps->info[rid]->uv_to_vsel(min_uV, &sel);
> -- 
> 1.7.9.5
> 
> 
> 
> 

��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{��G���{ay�ʇڙ���f���h������_�(�階�ݢj"��������G����?���&���iO����v��m��������?�I�