Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: support for regulator match by regulator-compatible

[Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tuesday 19 June 2012 03:02 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> * PGP Signed by an unknown key
>
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 11:21:26AM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> > Add API to match the chip regulator's id by the
> > property of "regulator-compatible" on regulator node.
> We shouldn't have two different methods for doing this, we should
> standardise this over all regulator drivers (or at the very least those
> using the existing framework code) - having the old framework in place
> will at best be confusing for authors of new drivers.  We either need to
> make it clear which framework to use or (ideally) remove the old
> framework.

Agree. Currently following regulators are using this (based on grep)
mfd/tps6586x.c
regulator/ab8500.c
regulator/db8500-prcmu.c
and regulator/tps65910.

If the related change in tps65910 is fine and there is no more 
concern/feedback on the approach then I can create a series of patch to 
modify the other regulator and related dts file to follow the same.

If you want, I can make the new changes as part of this series or can 
start with new series.

I like to go with new series patch for other change once this is accepted.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/