Re: [RFC PATCH net-next] hp100: delete VG/AnyLAN hp100

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> :
[...]
> I saw people using TR adapters with Linux as of 2008/9.
> 
> That doesn't mean it's common or make it desirable to
> keep TR in the current kernel tree though.

I'll leave token ring PCI drivers where they are for now.

> Is VG/AnyLAN different?

Your own word: "unused". I see nothing wrong asking users if they
still care. If no one cares about the hp100, fine.

-- 
Ueimor
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


[Index of Archives]

  Powered by Linux

[Older Kernel Discussion]     [Yosemite National Park Forum]     [Large Format Photos]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Stuff]     [Index of Other Archives]