Re: [PATCH v8 5/8] seccomp: Add SECCOMP_RET_TRAP

["H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 02/16/2012 12:28 PM, Markus Gutschke wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 12:02, Will Drewry <wad@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Adds a new return value to seccomp filters that triggers a SIGTRAP to be delivered with the new TRAP_SECCOMP si_code.
>>
>> This allows in-process system call emulation -- including just specifying an errno or cleanly dumping core -- rather than just dying.
> 
> SIGTRAP might not be the ideal choice of signal number, as it can make
> it very difficult to debug the program in gdb. Other than that, I love
> this feature. It'll significantly simplify the code that we have in
> Chrome.
> 

Sounds like SIGSYS to me.

	-hpa

-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/