Burkhard Lück posted on Tue, 10 Jul 2012 21:24:16 +0200 as excerpted:
Am Dienstag, 10. Juli 2012, 21:20:46 schrieb Sian Mountbatten:
This, apparently, is some kind of joke, because the manual consists of
a list of features, and that's all.
Does that mean that no manual has been written?
Yes.
Concise answer, correct AFAIK, but not very satisfying for those of us
who like a bit of detail...
Here's the deal. Free/libre (free as in freedom) and open source
software (FLOSS) is in an interesting situation in regard to
documentation. Much of it is done by volunteers, and documentation kind
of falls between the cracks.
Those who write the code and share it with us may be quite good at
coding, but many aren't so good at documentation. Coding is their
interest so what they tend to do when they have free time to volunteer.
Besides, the people writing the code aren't normally the best to document
it anyway, as they're too close to it, and most of it seems intuitive to
them, since they wrote it the way they thought it.
That leaves users. But there's a problem there as well. Either users
don't know enough about how it works to write the documentation, or by
the time they do, they no longer need it, so it's not so important to
them.