KDB support for x86_64?
|[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]|
Hi. On Saturday 01 April 2006 19:36, Peter Wainwright wrote: > On Sun, 2006-03-26 at 17:32 -0800, Jack Vogel wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 08:00:46AM +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > > > Hi. > > > > > > On Sunday 26 March 2006 21:58, Peter Wainwright wrote: > > > > Is KDB still maintained for the x86_64 architecture? oss.sgi.com has > > > > x86_64 patches for kernel 2.6.14 but not for more recent > > > > kernels. I tried to forward-port it to 2.6.16 myself but it is > > > > not giving a proper backtrace (%rsp seems to be wrong at > > > > breakpoints). > > > > > > > > Peter Wainwright > > > > > > I would find it useful too. I've forward ported it as well, and also > > > have the same backtrace problem. I guess it's probably simple to fix, > > > but it doesn't irk me enough that I've bothered to try to fix it. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Nigel > > > > Did you have the problem with the last patch, there was > > some backtrace changes that I accepted that I did not have > > time to test. It would be useful if you could check a before > > and after of that code. > > > > Regards, > > > > Jack > > The change I mentioned in the previous mail actually seems to > simplify things for the debugger, since SS/SP is now saved on > the interrupt stack at breakpoints. > This patch seems to work for me. Unless you can find some path > into kdba_getregcontents where SS/SP is NOT saved in regs? I'll give it a go. Regards, Nigel -- Attached file included as plaintext by Ecartis -- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBELkoDN0y+n1M3mo0RApAxAKDCgh8kLSZ+eLLogV961HVlzu91igCg6pDr vNQZpxqVTCEUs2RKQSZuhBI= =274P -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------- Use http://oss.sgi.com/ecartis to modify your settings or to unsubscribe.