|[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]|
On Feb 12, 2009, at 12:22 PM, Black_David@xxxxxxx wrote:
I wrote:I'll try to get some discussion about STORM activity started on the IPS and RDDP lists - people have been entirely too polite in replying to me about the BOF in private, leading some IETF observers to interpret no traffic on these lists as lack of interest. In particular, I'm hoping to get some second level scoping (list of things to be done) for work items including the iSCSI revision for Draft Standard (what to leave out), SAM-4 support for iSCSI (what to put in), and iSER revisions based on InfiniBand implementations (what IETF should do vs. leave to the IBTA).Here are three topics that it would be useful to discuss: - What's important/useful about new features from SAM-4. I know that there's interest in the new task management operations, but what else? Anything added here needs a new text key to negotiate it.
Command priority would be useful.Status qualifiers would be nice to have, but I think are less useful than command priority.
Best regards, -Steve -- Steve Byan <stevebyan@xxxxxxx> _______________________________________________ Ips mailing list Ips@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips