From: Julian Satran
[mailto:Julian_Satran@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007
12:35 PM
To: Silvano Gai
Cc: ips@xxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: FW: Recent
comments about FCoE and iSCSI
My question was specific - and with a reason. Julo
|
"Silvano Gai"
<sgai@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
26/04/07 14:33
|
|
To
|
Julian Satran/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL
|
|
cc
|
<ips@xxxxxxxx>
|
|
Subject
|
RE: FW: Recent comments about FCoE and
iSCSI
|
|
Julo,
I am not sure what you are asking for.
Are you asking for a reference to a 1,000+ port SAN?
Today there are multiple FC switches on the market with 256
ports.
With six switches it is easy to realize a 1,000+ port SAN?
Are you trying to tell me that 6 FC switches cannot be
connected together?
-- Silvano
From: Julian Satran
[mailto:Julian_Satran@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 11:25 AM
To: Silvano Gai
Cc: ips@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: FW: Recent comments about FCoE and iSCSI
Please send this community a reference of a 1000+ node datacenter using FCP as
a single fabric.
Julo
|
"Silvano Gai"
<sgai@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
26/04/07 13:26
|
|
To
|
<ips@xxxxxxxx>
|
|
cc
|
|
|
Subject
|
Re: FW: Recent comments about FCoE and
iSCSI
|
|
* Subject: Re: FW: Recent comments about FCoE and iSCSI
* From: "Eddy Quicksall" <Quicksall_iSCSI at
Bellsouth.net>
* Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:15:22 -0400
Eddy Wrote:
> Further, I think PAUSE is only for point-to-point and I think that is
too > restrictive.
Eddy,
In Fibre Channel credits are only point-to-point and FC networks work
well for datacenter environments.
Where is the difference?
-- Silvano
_______________________________________________
Ips mailing list
Ips@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips
