[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Google
  Web www.spinics.net

Re: IMPORTANT: WG Last Call on NodeArchitecture Key changes



On Oct 16, 2006, at 21:36, William Studenmund wrote:
My thought when we did this was that if a key was going to be a proposed standard, we would not use the [XYZ]# space for it.

So rather than changing the text, why not just make the key "NodeArchitecture"? :-) My understanding is that existing implementations will (should?) react the same way to such a key as they would to X#NodeArchitecture (NotUnderstood), so we don't have an interoperation issue.

If the group wants to stick with X#, I am not opposed to changing the text.

I *would* like to see this document go to PS. If the WG comes to consensus on either David's or your proposal, that'd be fine with me.

Lars
--
Lars Eggert                                     NEC Network Laboratories


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
Ips mailing list
Ips@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips

[IETF]     [Linux iSCSI]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Resources]     [Yosemite News]     [IETF Announcements]     [IETF Discussion]     [SCSI]

Add to Google Powered by Linux