| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
Hi,
I modified it and set it to 16384 as requested. I
attached the tcpdump of the login process. I also
still get the too lond messages and the dd takes a
realy long time. Running top shows istd1 using 99.9%
of CPU usage. A sample follows of the lond data
messages follows:
Mar 28 19:50:35 localhost kernel:
check_segment_length(1552) too lond data 9f 65536 8192
Mar 28 19:50:35 localhost kernel:
check_segment_length(1552) too lond data a0 65536 8192
Mar 28 19:50:35 localhost kernel:
check_segment_length(1552) too lond data a1 65536 8192
Mar 28 19:50:35 localhost kernel:
check_segment_length(1552) too lond data a2 65536 8192
Mar 28 19:50:35 localhost kernel:
check_segment_length(1552) too lond data a3 65536 8192
Mar 28 19:50:36 localhost kernel:
check_segment_length(1552) too lond data a4 65536 8192
Mar 28 19:50:36 localhost kernel:
check_segment_length(1552) too lond data a5 65536 8192
Mar 28 19:50:36 localhost kernel:
check_segment_length(1552) too lond data a6 65536 8192
Mar 28 19:50:36 localhost kernel:
check_segment_length(1552) too lond data a7 65536 8192
--- Ming Zhang <mingz@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 17:44 +0200, Arne Redlich
> wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, den 28.03.2006, 10:04 -0500 schrieb
> Ming Zhang:
> > > @Arne, could you help me to check this as well.
> > >
> > > i guess ietd.conf does not contain this
> parameter, so it is left to
> > > default and thus iet does not declare it. but
> core-ini does not use
> > > default value 8192 as the maxrecvdsl for ini, i
> guess it uses what it
> > > declared.
> >
> > Yep, that's rather likely. At least core-iscsi
> 1.6.2.2 had this bug:
> >
>
http://groups.google.com/group/Core-iSCSI/browse_frm/thread/a0b66ade9417b738/79c039a6a2f7a940#79c039a6a2f7a940
> >
> > Skimming through the changelogs of 1.6.2.{3,4}, it
> doesn't look as if it
> > has been fixed. Nicholas?
>
> thanks for pointing out this. :P
>
> >
> > Arne
>
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com Attachment:
log2
Description: 2336011066-log2
[IP Storage] [IETF] [Linux SCSI] [iSCSI Book] [Linux Resources] [Yosemite News] [Photo] [Home] [IETF Announcements] [IETF Discussion] [SCSI Hardware]