|[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]|
>>>>> "Stephen" == Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@xxxxxxxxx> writes: Stephen> Sorry, I should've asked this before but I'm sometimes dumb:-) Stephen> If I put in an RFC editor note adding a normative reference Stephen> to the new EAP applicability statement  would that sort Stephen> this out and not cause any problems for anyone? I don't object to that, but it does hold up the doc. I'm happy letting this doc go forward now so long as we're all on the same page on the applicability stament. I realize we run the risk that somehow the applicability effort derails. Personally, I'm willing to take that risk, so long as we believe today we do intend to publish the applicability statement. If someone on the IESG or in the community wants that normative reference, I support adding it. I'm just not asking for it myself.