Re: Comments for <I-D of Publishing the "Tao of the IETF" as a Web Page>

[Barry Leiba <barryleiba@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> The abstract mentions 'many people',  because many people may mean 4 to 10

> people. The annonced I-D lacks the method of discussion in the community

> (discussing such change), the draft mentions the input from any community

> individual to be accepted by editor and then approved by IESG, but does not

> mention the methodology of discussion between community members nor

> between editor and members, also no announcements of such updates

> mentioned in draft.

On this, as well as on the rest of the comments in the same message:

The IETF already has a process for discussion, review, and consensus, and this document neither changes any of it nor, I think, needs to repeat it.

Barry