Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
Melinda Shore wrote:
>
> On 5/10/12 5:04 AM, Martin Rex wrote:
> > Peter Sylvester wrote:
> >> On 05/10/2012 11:17 AM, David Morris wrote:
> >>> I object to the quantum change in ease of access and persistence of the
> >>> information. I see way too much aggregation of personal information and
> >>> don't think open-ness is justification for increasing that potential.
> >> +1
> > +1
>
> I disagree rather strongly. This is an open standards body with an open
> process, and I think if we're going to change that it needs to be as a
> result of a more general discussion rather than simply chipping away
> around the edges.
There has never been a need to actively broadcast these massive amounts
of personally identifiable information (PII), and I haven't seen any
convincing rationale for doing it now.
Whenever dealing with PII the most responsible action is to distribute
it only when a real need has been demonstrated. When publishing information
on the internet, it is not possible to undo it, so it is better to err
on the safe side for PII.
-Martin
[IETF Annoucements]
[IETF Obscurity Interest]
[IETF]
[IP Storage]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux]
[Pilates]
[Linux SCTP]
[Linux Newbies]
[Fedora Users]