[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Is the IETF aging?

To: IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Is the IETF aging?
From: "Worley, Dale R (Dale)" <dworley@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 21:55:08 -0400
Accept-language: en-US
Acceptlanguage: en-US
Delivered-to: ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <8DC137508AE27AAD6CC12654@PST.JCK.COM>
Thread-index: Ac0n2pBDhEhBfDMoTp6uWSHxN3vu8gALAnIo
Thread-topic: Is the IETF aging?

________________________________________
From: John C Klensin [john-ietf@xxxxxxx]

The harder part
--because it does require community and leadership commitment --
is finding ways to make those mentoring/ advisory roles work.
________________________________________

What would be good patterns for those roles?

Dale

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is the IETF aging?
  - From: Melinda Shore

References:
- Is the IETF aging?
  - From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Is the IETF aging?
  - From: Mary Barnes
- RE: Is the IETF aging?
  - From: John C Klensin

Prev by Date: RE: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register
Next by Date: Re: Is the IETF aging?
Previous by thread: RE: Is the IETF aging?
Next by thread: Re: Is the IETF aging?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[IETF Annoucements] [IETF Obscurity Interest] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux] [Pilates] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]