RE: Is the IETF aging?
- To: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@xxxxxxxxx>, Carsten Bormann <cabo@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: Is the IETF aging?
- From: "Worley, Dale R (Dale)" <dworley@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 11:44:56 -0400
- Accept-language: en-US
- Acceptlanguage: en-US
- Cc: IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
- Delivered-to: ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <CAMm+LwjEOSDxWP==FfY7i2GQpKsRwj4Daoq_5Not9D=Ya-Ej5A@mail.gmail.com>
- Thread-index: Ac0kidO/8ap5QEq5QomITJaFsh3+YwAAt4lf
- Thread-topic: Is the IETF aging?
> From: Phillip Hallam-Baker [hallam@xxxxxxxxx]
> Security could very well be an area that faces rather different
> challenges to other areas.
Of course -- In most areas, a creative, low-cost solution that works
90% of the time can be the basis of a new company, if not an entire
industry. In security, a creative, low-cost solution that works 90%
of the time is a disaster. So security is biased toward careful,
extremely experienced workers.
[IETF Obscurity Interest]