[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [nvo3] WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) - 25-Apr-2012 update

To: Pat Thaler <pthaler@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, jopeliss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [nvo3] WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) - 25-Apr-2012 update
From: Stewart Bryant <stbryant@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 00:58:30 +0100
Cc: "nvo3@xxxxxxxx" <nvo3@xxxxxxxx>, "iesg@xxxxxxxx" <iesg@xxxxxxxx>, IETF Discussion <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <EB9B93801780FD4CA165E0FBCB3C3E670524D8@SJEXCHMB09.corp.ad.broadcom.com>
Reply-to: stbryant@xxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1

Does deleting "IETF" in the following
sentence:

"Any documented solutions
will use existing IETF protocols if suitable."

satisfy your concerns?

- Stewart

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [nvo3] WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) - 25-Apr-2012 update
  - From: Pat Thaler

References:
- Re: [nvo3] WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) - 23-Apr-2012 update
  - From: Stewart Bryant
- WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) - 25-Apr-2012 update
  - From: Stewart Bryant
- RE: [nvo3] WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) - 25-Apr-2012 update
  - From: Pat Thaler

Prev by Date: Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
Next by Date: Re: [nvo3] WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) - 25-Apr-2012 update
Previous by thread: RE: [nvo3] WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) - 25-Apr-2012 update
Next by thread: RE: [nvo3] WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) - 25-Apr-2012 update
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[IETF Annoucements] [IETF Obscurity Interest] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux] [Pilates] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]