[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
  Web www.spinics.net

Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets

On 4/22/12 23:54 , Yoav Nir wrote:
> On Apr 23, 2012, at 9:00 AM, Joel jaeggli wrote:
>> On 4/22/12 22:45 , Robert Raszuk wrote:
>>> Joel,
>>>> What property of the blue sheet makes it personal data.
>>> WG meeting title and name or email address.
>>> Nothing more helpful for recruiters to get hold of such list and
>>> start spamming with job offers in given area of technology.
>> The participants are readily identifiable already.
> Effort matters. If getting that data requires a subpoena, or if it
> requires a formal letter from a lawyer, or if it's available on the
> website, these are different things. I'm with Tobias on this.
>> But that wasn't my question. What data on the blue sheet is
>> personal?
> It says where I was, and at what time, and it's nobody's business.

in the context of the meeting it is in fact the purpose of the blue sheet.


   All working group actions shall be taken in a public forum, and wide
   participation is encouraged. A working group will conduct much of its
   business via electronic mail distribution lists but may meet
   periodically to discuss and review task status and progress, to
   resolve specific issues and to direct future activities.  IETF
   Plenary meetings are the primary venue for these face-to-face working
   group sessions, and it is common (though not required) that active
   "interim" face-to-face meetings, telephone conferences, or video
   conferences may also be held.  Interim meetings are subject to the
   same rules for advance notification, reporting, open participation,
   and process, which apply to other working group meetings.

   All working group sessions (including those held outside of the IETF
   meetings) shall be reported by making minutes available.  These
   minutes should include the agenda for the session, an account of the
   discussion including any decisions made, and a list of attendees.

> It's information that does not need to be disclosed to the public,
> and therefore shouldn't. We don't have to come up with an attack
> vector first.
>> Every person who has registered since at least the publication of
>> 3979 if not before has consented to the public disclosure of
>> records of the meeting. a list of the meeting attendees is required
>> by 2418.
> Again, this is a different level of information. On the streets,
> Legally I don't have an expectation of privacy. The police, or anyone
> who cares to, may follow me around, and see where I'm going. There
> is, however, a huge const involved in this, and that's why 20 years
> ago, people did have an expectation of privacy on the streets. Having
> surveillance cameras at street corners like they have in too much of
> the western world right now does not change what the police can or
> cannot do to an individual. There is a huge change, though, because
> now they can afford to track everyone all the time.
> Connect those cameras to the Internet as publicly accessible webcams,
> and our society turns into a whole new kind of surveillance society.
> Publishing blue sheets is not as bad as that, but it's a step in the
> wrong direction.
> Yoav

[IETF Annoucements]     [IETF Obscurity Interest]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux]     [Pilates]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]

Add to Google