[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments

To: Scott O Bradner <sob@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
From: Joel jaeggli <joelja@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 10:01:29 -0700
Cc: adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxx, ietf@xxxxxxxx, wgchairs@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <248A261F-D83D-4F97-8F5D-A9A0BCD2EC0D@sobco.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1

On 4/19/12 13:48 , Scott O Bradner wrote:
> encouraging a report is fine
> 
> retracting the code points seems to add more confusion than it is worth unless the
> code space is very tight
> 

unless retracting  involves marking it do not use, I too do no see value
in doing that.

References:
- Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
  - From: Adrian Farrel
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
  - From: Scott O Bradner

Prev by Date: Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
Next by Date: Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
Previous by thread: Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
Next by thread: RE: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[IETF Annoucements] [IETF Obscurity Interest] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux] [Pilates] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]