Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis)
[ no hat ]
On 3/1/12 11:01 AM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> On 01/03/2012 17:50, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> Stephen and I just had a chat about this matter. He and I came up with a
>> proposed paragraph to add after that list of bullet points:
>>
>> In the initial phase of work on HTTP/2.0, new proposals
>> for authentication schemes can be made. The WG will
>> select zero or more of those with a goal of choosing
>> at least one scheme that is better than those available
>> for HTTP/1.x. Non-selected schemes might be discussed
>> with the IETF Security Area for further work there.
>>
>> Your comments are welcome.
>
> Can I suggest you also include authorization capabilities as a core
> component of this. It's not much use to have people able to authenticate
> themselves to a system if that system doesn't also provide a framework for
> allowing the server-side application decide what they can or cannot do.
Feel free to include that in your proposal. :)
Peter
--
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
[IETF Annoucements]
[IETF Obscurity Interest]
[IETF]
[IP Storage]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux]
[Pilates]
[Linux SCTP]
[Linux Newbies]
[Fedora Users]