Re: DCCP & port randomization
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 10:52 AM, Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
I looked at the new text in rev -06 looks like it may be appropriate.
Sorry... does the current text look okay?
I note that you used "should not" rather than "SHOULD NOT" - was that intentional, and if so, why.
I guess I just added a clarification for DCCP but didn't mean to add a "new" req. In retrospective, one my argue that I should s/should not/SHOULD NOT/ both for DCCP and for TCP (and probably for SCTP, too).
e-mail: fernando@xxxxxxxxxxx || fgont@xxxxxxx
PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1
[DDR & Rambus]