[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Google
  Web www.spinics.net

Re: DCCP & port randomization



On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 10:52 AM, Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
 
I looked at the new text in rev -06 looks like it may be appropriate.

Sorry... does the current text look okay?


 
I note that you used "should not" rather than "SHOULD NOT" - was that intentional, and if so, why.

I guess I just added a clarification for DCCP but didn't mean to add a "new" req. In retrospective, one my argue that I should s/should not/SHOULD NOT/ both for DCCP and for TCP (and probably for SCTP, too).

Thoughts? Comments?

--
Fernando Gont
e-mail: fernando@xxxxxxxxxxx || fgont@xxxxxxx
PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1

[Kernel List]     [Linux DCCP]     [IETF Annouce]     [Linux Networking]     [Git]     [Security]     [Linux Assembly]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [DDR & Rambus]     [Linux Resources]

Powered by Linux