Re: One ring to rule them all (generic UDP encap oftransports)

["Phelan, Tom" <tphelan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Lars,

Yes, it sounds like Michael and I are taking very similar approaches.  I think we can work together to keep the DCCP draft and Michael's upcoming SCTP draft reasonably compatible.  Michael, are you up for that?

Tom P.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dccp-bounces@xxxxxxxx [mailto:dccp-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> Lars Eggert
> Sent: Monday, November 23, 2009 4:03 AM
> To: Michael Tüxen
> Cc: gorry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; DCCP working group; Phelan, Tom
> Subject: Re:  One ring to rule them all (generic UDP encap
> oftransports)
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On 2009-11-21, at 0:34, Michael Tüxen wrote:
> > On Nov 20, 2009, at 9:21 PM, Phelan, Tom wrote:
> >> Thanks for the info on SCTP.  That makes it sound like SCTP and DCCP
> encaps could be high-level-approach compatible.  Is there a draft you're
> working from for SCTP encap?  The last one I saw was substantially
> different from what you describe.
> >
> > the last was is outdated. It was written before I implemented the stuff
> in
> > the SCTP implementation of FreeBSD and Mac OS X.
> > I'm planning to update it for the next IETF.
> 
> I think it'd be desirable if the proposed UDP encapsulations for DCCP and
> SCTP were as similar as possible.
> 
> Lars